The Results Service
Here are the results of the first Carbon Trading magazine market survey
Words: Robin Lancaster
There was a time when a survey of the world’s carbon markets would focus almost wholly
on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
and the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM). But the times they are a changing.
This, the first Carbon Trading market survey, goes beyond those two markets to include North America, Australia and New Zealand and the voluntary sector. Future years could see further expansion to countries
and regions, such as China and Kazakhstan, while others could perhaps fall away.
Market participants were invited to vote in the survey over a three-week period in late October and early November. Voters were asked to make judgements based on efficiency and quality of service, reliability in the market and ability to adapt to changing market conditions.
The response, given the short time period the survey was open, was better than anticipated by the magazine. More than 400 people completed the online voting questionnaire during the three-week period – in future, it is
likely that more time will be given to complete the survey.
The EU ETS categories polled well, as would probably be expected of what is still the world’s largest carbon market. Trading giant Vitol topped the best trading company, with Barclays coming in as runner up. Vitol
also won the same category for the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) and was second in North America.
London-based broker Icap topped the best brokerage EU ETS category, just ahead of energy and environmental markets specialist Evolution Markets. Evolution was prominent in the other broking categories. The US-based company was the winner of best brokerage firm CDM, North America and the voluntary carbon market.
In the voluntary market, another sector that polled well, UK-based Climate Care stood out taking top spot in two categories – best trading company and best project developer – as well as joint winner of the best advisory firm category.
“We are delighted to be recognised again for our work in the voluntary market,” said Edward Hanrahan, director of Climate Care. “To win across the three main categories
|
… is a strong validation of the integrated, holistic approach
EU Emissions Trading Scheme
Clean Development Mechanism
|
Winner |
Runner up |
Best trading company |
Vitol |
Barclays |
Best brokerage firm |
Icap |
Evolution Markets |
Best verification company |
DNV |
SGS |
Best advisory firm |
ICF International |
Ecofys |
Best law firm |
Baker & McKenzie |
Norton Rose |
Best exchange |
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) |
European Energy Exchange |
16 | Carbon Trading | Dec 2012/Jan 2013
Survey
2012 Carbon Market Survey
North America
|
Winner |
Runner up |
Best trading company |
CE2 Capital |
Vitol |
Best brokerage firm |
Evolution Markets |
Karbon |
Best project developer |
Environmental Credit Corp |
EOS Climate |
Best validation company |
First Environment |
Scientific Certification Systems |
Best verification company |
First Environment |
Scientific Certification Systems |
Best law firm |
Baker & McKenzie |
Van Ness Feldman |
Best exchange |
ICE |
(No clear 2nd place) |
Australia/New Zealand
|
Winner |
Runner up |
Best trading company |
Westpac Bank |
Macquarie Bank |
Best brokerage firm |
OM Financial |
Carbon Match |
Best project developer |
CO2 Australia |
Climate Friendly |
Best advisory firm |
Climate Friendly |
CO2 Australia |
Best law firm |
Baker & McKenzie |
Norton Rose |
that we bring to client and partner relationships,” he said. “Through the last 15 years of constant innovation, a
key driver for us has always been working with partners towards a shared end goal of maximising impacts for people, for the environment – and for our corporate clients and investors. Strong, enduring relationships, as well as continual benchmarking are essential to this success
and for this reason, peer and industry voted awards are particularly important to us,” he added.
The Carbon Neutral Company was the other winner of the best advisory company voluntary market, in what turned out to be the most contested title in the whole survey. The company also came in second in the best trading voluntary market poll.
Another voluntary market category that drew a lot of votes was best registry. This was won by Markit, with APX/ NYSE Blue coming in second. The best law firm in the voluntary market was Baker & McKenzie. The global firm was also successful in all of the other law firm categories, with Norton Rose coming runner up in each one, apart
from the voluntary market section where Linklaters came second, and North America which saw Van Ness Feldman as runner up.
Other companies successful in the voluntary market part of the survey were US-based Scientific Certification Systems (SCS), which won both best validation and verification categories. SCS was also runner up in the same groups for North America, which were head by First Environment.
The best voluntary market standard went to the US-
based Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), with Switzerland- headquartered Gold Standard coming a close second. The
VCS started out as the Voluntary Carbon Standard, but the name change last year signifies that it’s work is now stretching well beyond just the voluntary sector.
The CDM category also polled well, just behind the EU ETS and voluntary carbon market. It will be interesting to see how well the sector polls next year, after restrictions
on the use of CDM credits in the EU cap-and-trade system
– the largest source of demand – come into play.
This year, however, South Pole Carbon was the winner of the best project developer category, closely followed
by Sweden-based Tricorona. Norway-based DNV topped the best Designated Operational Entity (DOE) category – a DOE carries out validation and verification services on a project – and was also the best verifier EU ETS poll. Tüv Rheinland came in second in the CDM.
Netherlands-based Climate Focus came out winner of the best advisory firm CDM, with ICF International in second place. ICF did, however, win the same poll in the EU ETS section. The last category for the CDM was best exchange. This was won by the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which also headed the same category in the EU ETS and North America sections.
BlueNext, which recently announced that it will close, still polled in second place in the CDM category, while Leipzig-based European Energy Exchange came in second in the EU ETS poll. There was no clear second place in the North America section.
The North America section may well need to be split into separate categories in the future, with California and Quebec starting cap-and-trade schemes from 1 January. This year the continent was treated a whole and polled CE2 Capital Partners as best trading company and Environmental Credit Corp as best project developer.
Another section that may need to be split in the future
is Australia/New Zealand. This year’s results saw Australia- based bank Westpac win the best trading company, OM Financial win the best brokerage firm. CO2 Australia won best developer and came second in the best advisory company, which was won by Climate Friendly. The latter company was also runner up in the best project developer section. l
|
Voluntary Carbon Market
Carbon Trading would like to express its congratulations to all the winners and thanks all the people who took the time out to vote in the magazine’s first survey of this kind.